O direito ao processo justo e sua realização por meio do emprego do critério diacrônico de interpretação dos fundamentos jurídicos : por uma compreensão da historicidade em Reinhart Koselleck para demarcar a vinculação aos padrões decisórios do Superior Tribunal de Justiça

Abstract

The doctoral work deals with a proposal of understanding about the functionality of the binding of the courts to the decision-making standards established by the Superior Court of Justice. The research issue is centered on the need to identify the dynamics of standardization of judicial decisions, beyond the basis of the static legal criteria provided for in article 927 of the Code of Civil Procedure, due to the legal consistency between lawsuit linked to decision-making standards of the Superior Court of Justice. The hypothesis draw in this study is that the fundamental right to a fair trial involves the duty of legal coherence to impose upon the judicial lawsuit the "space of experience" and the "expectation horizon" of the interpretation of the ratio decidendi, which may be the historical criterion (diachronic) of understanding of the lawsuit, which justfies the linkage with the decision-making standards established by the Superior Court of Justice. It is argued that yhe systematics of binding to decision-making standards presupposes consideration of this diachonic criterion, which is based on the "space of experience" and the "horizon of expectation" of the decisional foundations of the lawsuit, on the trail of the method of conceptual history, of Reinhart Koselleck. The objective of this research is to offer rational criteria that allow us to guide the dynamics of standardization of judicial decisions signed in the Supreme Court, due to the argumentative coherence that supports the fundamental right to a fair trial. It is proposed as a thesis that the diachronic legal interpretation, based on the experience and expectation formed around the ration decidendi applied to the lawsuit, is understood as an expression of the fundamental right to the fair lawsuit. The methodological approach is hypothetic-deductive.