O controle judicial da sanção disciplinar militar à luz do princípio da proporcionalidade e os princípios da hierarquia e disciplina

Abstract

This dissertation presents the problem of judicial control of disproportionate sanction disciplinary military in the face of the principles of hierarchy and discipline that structure the military organization of the Brazilian Armed Forces. The method of approach is deductive and methods of procedure are documentary and bibliographic. Works with the hypothesis that it is appropriate to judicial review of sanction disciplinary military when disproportionate since performed with the appropriate modus operandi, because the impairment of military hierarchy and discipline will occur if the judge does not have mastery of the topic and its specificity, nor are observed significant issues, procedural and material. The administrative discretion is treated to deny unrestricted freedom and the binding is designed not only as a link to the law, but to the system, whereat it is important to refer to the constitutional principles, especially that of proportionality. Within this theme, the approach of the fundamental right to good public administration gains special importance, it goes beyond the construction of public policies, efficiency, transparency, to encompass also the "good decision", in other words, the administrative decision-making acts are in accordance with the legal system. Recognizes the specificity of the "military life" that imposes self-denial and sacrifice without correspondence in "civilian life", including, often, with his life in the name of achieving constitutional mission assigned to the armed forces. It is argued, however, that this specificity is not obstacle to prevent judicial review of sanction disciplinary military. The control activity punitive gives more credibility to the penalty imposed, and the long-term, strengthens the hierarchy and discipline within the military organizations. Regarding the technicality involving the theme, the magistrate may make avail of specialized staff, especially for the more complex issues involving the day to day of the barracks. It is considered, finally, that judicial review should be carried out in a systematic way, with the breakdown of the principle of proportionality in subprinciples the appropriateness, necessity and proportionality in the strict sense, as well as the declaration of nullity of the act, if the case, but without pointing that the act should be practiced by the administrator, it is not for the judge to make the role of the military sanctioning authority in respect of the principle of separation of powers.