A adequada tutela jurisdicional do ato administrativo discricionário como instrumento de promoção e realização dos objetivos fundamentais da república brasileira fundamentos e contornos da ação direta de ilegalidade da discricionariedade administrativa de interesse nacional

Abstract

The present thesis pursues to indicate the new, or renewed, legal techniques including comprising legal procedural to enable better control of discretionary administrative activities of the State, in order to promote a practical and concrete effectiveness of the goals of the Republic of Brazil printed on Article 3rd of the Brazilian Constitution 1988. The purposes to present as part of discretionary administrative act, also, the full scope of jurisdictional mastery (sindicabilidade), being that, it represents the expression of the public onus established in the current Democratic Republican State of Law, as diction of the Federal Constitution of 1988. Therefore, it is analyzed the role of Public Administration in the State duty of the concretization and to implement realization of public interest, through a concatenated and harmonious juridical administrative system, made possible by the exercise of prerogatives (powers) and constraints (principles) of the administrative activity of the State. In this scenario, it is unblemished the structure and operation of administrative acts, with highlights to those who have some legal margin of governance, known as discretionary. It is made known, also, the current tendency of jurisprudence of the Superior Courts on judicial review of discretionary administrative act, indicating to the heterogeneity of decisions on the subject, a fact that demands the establishment of a new "North" to be followed to provide adequate protection of Constitutional state's judicial administrative activity. Thus, this work analyzes the necessity to adapt old techniques of interpretation of the administrative discretionary act, and indicates ways to overcome practices that no longer maintain the current Constitutional context, such as, among others: the shield of administrative merit against the respective judicial control and review, the shallow interpretation of the Theory of Tripartition of Powers the absence of democratic legitimacy of the State Judge. Consequently, there are appropriate ways to assist the maintenance and sustainability of the system as a legitimate form of protecting the lives of citizens: the consequentialist interpretation, the rational weighing of the values involved, and the inclusion of the criterion of administrative act demonstration of a causal nexus between the production of the act and the public interest to be achieved. In conclusion, the Thesis suggests a technique of Law, judicial-procedural, able to deal with intimidations and battering on rights arising from discretionary administrative activities unreached that undermine the state system legitimately established, bringing systemic instability, generating event of negative consequences for the development intersubjective for the participants of the State. It follows then that there are state administrative activities outside the scope of the constitutional principle of judicial protection of inseparability thus creating shadow areas of administrative activity of the State, misshapen republican and democratic values printed in the Constitution. Therefore, such discretionary activities need to be reincorporated into the Constitutional legal contexture, necessary in relation to their sustainability, through the techniques suggested in order to objectification, to extent maximum is possible, the mastery(sindicabilidade) of the administrative merit, especially those that bring relevant national systemic astonishment as evidence that any public act must be under the aegis of Constitutional Republican system of responsibility and control of public activity.