Compreensão de texto escrito e oral e correlatados neurais na lesão de hemisfério esquerdo pós acidente vascular cerebral

Abstract

Written and oral text comprehension abilities are indispensable for human experiences. Strokes causing left hemisphere (LH) damage may impact comprehension and textual production. However, little is known about this influence at the textual/discursive level, including the comparison between oral and written modalities in this kind of lesion. This research aimed at investigating text comprehension in two modalities of presentation (read and heard) by left brain damaged individuals (LBD) and healthy controls, comparing their performance in the micro- and macro-structural levels of text comprehension to neuropsychological data and to density of the brain areas involved. In order to do that, we performed two researches, Study 1, with 18 LBD and 10 controls, and Study 2, with 10 LBD and 10 controls, with matched age and education. In both studies, neuropsychological tests assessed working memory, verbal fluency and naming abilities. Comprehension of macro- and microstructural levels was verified by means of six short narratives, presented in oral or written modality. The participants were asked to retell the stories and answer to five interpretation questions. In Study 2, the same method was used, but it included structural magnetic resonance imaging indicating the density of brain regions by voxel-based morphometry (VBM). The results of Study 1 indicated significant differences in narrative comprehension between LBD and controls. The lower performance observed at the macrostructural level of LBD compared to the micro- suggest individuals who had a stroke may face difficulties in the application of macrorules of deletion, construction and generalization, which underlie overall comprehension of a text. The data from Study 2, with a lower number of participants, indicated a tendency to confirm results found in Study 1, with statistical significant differences in benefit of controls at the macrostructural level of oral narratives. We found significant differences between groups regarding the modality of text presentation. In both Study 1 and Study 2, differences were observed between the groups in auditory word span and in naming, with an advantage to controls. The morphometry data of brain regions, related to the participants of Study 2, indicated an integration of areas from left and right hemispheres to process text comprehension in oral and written modalities. In the left hemisphere, precuneus, cerebellum white matter, superior frontal region and medial orbitofrontal region and from the right hemisphere, accumbens and superior temporal sulcus were observed. The right superior temporal sulcus, left precuneus, left cerebellar white matter and superior frontal region are positively correlated among the participants, presenting better performance as the density increases. The left medial orbitofrontal region shows a negative correlation with comprehension. The right accumbens seems to compensate LH demands, showing increased density in the LBD and reduced volume in the controls. The present study intends to contribute to deepen our understanding of the comprehension of texts presented in the oral compared to written modality in the LH lesion, related to neuropsychological and brain data.