Descriminantes putativas típicas : o erro sobre os elementos normativos formulados negativamente

Abstract

The present thesis establishes a path to differentiate the conscience of the wrongfulness enough for the existence of deceit, from the one that requires the knowledge itself of prohibition of the conduct practiced by the agent, thus setting the parameters for the treatment of error about the normative element of the crime description formulated negatively in the same way that the putative discriminant. The importance of this analysis bears in the recognition of the error upon the wrongfulness described into crime, beyond the limits of error iuris nocet; is to say, it allows analyzing the error of the agent about the prohibition of conduct when that comes related, explicitly, as the element of the crime description. Therefore, was made a deductive approach of the theme, through the bibliographic research of bias historical comparison, in order to, after weaving an overview about the origin and development of the problem, investigate, into historical evolution and in the universe of the crime descriptions made with these negatively formulated elements, the existence of a path to the analysis of the negative formulations into crime descriptions, delimiting the deceit and the prohibition. In this way, this path allows a new approach of the error on the negatively formulated normative elements in the context of the putative discriminant contained in the crime description, allowing the use of the law, in these cases, closer of the awareness of the prohibition required from the agent at the time of the event.